<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting serious with China?</title>
	<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/</link>
	<description>This blog goes where few traders dare - the exciting world of Forex outside the dollar!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Central Bank&#8217;s minutes. &#124; fxmadness.com</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3935</link>
		<dc:creator>Central Bank&#8217;s minutes. &#124; fxmadness.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3935</guid>
		<description>[...] behind the move aside, I liked it. My GBP-JPY trade, last mentioned in the Getting serious with China post made another solid move. Stop loss can be moved to above entry price, thus making sure this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] behind the move aside, I liked it. My GBP-JPY trade, last mentioned in the Getting serious with China post made another solid move. Stop loss can be moved to above entry price, thus making sure this [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3902</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3902</guid>
		<description>Alex, I'm staying home, at least not traveling far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I&#8217;m staying home, at least not traveling far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3901</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3901</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear it Damian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear it Damian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 05:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>Good work on Queen, as always. Are you heading to Majorca for you birthday or staying on the dark side of the pond?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work on Queen, as always. Are you heading to Majorca for you birthday or staying on the dark side of the pond?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3899</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 05:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3899</guid>
		<description>Everybody, press, tv, was talking about the Pound falling straight to hell, so I short gbp-usd only to see it snap against for hundreds of pips. Awfull. You manage to to buy the Pound and have fun. Is it OK to send you an email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody, press, tv, was talking about the Pound falling straight to hell, so I short gbp-usd only to see it snap against for hundreds of pips. Awfull. You manage to to buy the Pound and have fun. Is it OK to send you an email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prudence</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3896</link>
		<dc:creator>Prudence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3896</guid>
		<description>So its like stocks where the true value of the company has nothing to do with the price of its stock?  Like what sterling actually trades at is unrelated to how much momentum the GBP/? could provide on a good-news day, even if it were bogus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So its like stocks where the true value of the company has nothing to do with the price of its stock?  Like what sterling actually trades at is unrelated to how much momentum the GBP/? could provide on a good-news day, even if it were bogus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3895</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3895</guid>
		<description>Long term fundamentals have not changed. It is possible some changes are happening under the surface, but nothing is visible yet. Charts are better to trade, me thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long term fundamentals have not changed. It is possible some changes are happening under the surface, but nothing is visible yet. Charts are better to trade, me thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prudence</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3892</link>
		<dc:creator>Prudence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3892</guid>
		<description>So it's like stocks are now.  Moves up have nothing to do with fundamentals but just "where the money was flowing."  I seem to recall you posting about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s like stocks are now.  Moves up have nothing to do with fundamentals but just &#8220;where the money was flowing.&#8221;  I seem to recall you posting about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3891</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3891</guid>
		<description>That's why it is difficult to trade short term fundamentals. Pound went up because that's where the money was flowing. Now the tricky part is to decide if this is just a correction, or a more important reversal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why it is difficult to trade short term fundamentals. Pound went up because that&#8217;s where the money was flowing. Now the tricky part is to decide if this is just a correction, or a more important reversal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prudence</title>
		<link>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3837</link>
		<dc:creator>Prudence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fxmadness.com/2009/10/16/general/getting-serious-with-china/#comment-3837</guid>
		<description>Fundamentally speaking I don't get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fundamentally speaking I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
